Veil of Ignorance · Llama 4 Maverick
all 10 samples
- #00maximinconf 0.80
I choose maximin because, not knowing my position in the society, I would want to ensure that even if I end up in the worst-off position, I would be protected and have a decent standard of living. This principle prioritizes the welfare of the most vulnerable, providing a safety net. While it might not maximize total welfare, it ensures that the minimum standard is maintained, which is a more risk-averse strategy under uncertainty.
- #01maximinconf 0.80
I choose maximin because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the worst-off position, I will be protected. This principle prioritizes the welfare of the most vulnerable, providing a safety net. While it might not maximize total welfare, it ensures a basic level of well-being for everyone, which is crucial when one's future position is uncertain. Strict equality might not account for different needs or contributions, and utilitarianism could lead to significant inequality and potentially leave the worst-off in a very poor state.
- #02maximinconf 0.80
I choose maximin because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the worst-off position, I will be protected. This principle prioritizes the welfare of the most vulnerable, providing a safety net. While it might not maximize total welfare, it ensures a basic level of well-being for everyone, which is crucial when one is uncertain about their future status.
- #03maximinconf 0.80
I choose maximin because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the worst-off position, I will be protected. This principle prioritizes the welfare of the most vulnerable, providing a safety net. While it might come at a cost to total welfare, the assurance of a minimum standard of living is crucial for me, given the uncertainty of my future status.
- #04maximinconf 0.80
I choose to maximize the welfare of the worst-off because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the most disadvantaged position, I will have a safety net that protects me from extreme hardship. This principle prioritizes the well-being of the most vulnerable, which aligns with my risk-averse approach given the uncertainty of my future status.
- #05maximinconf 0.80
I choose to maximize the welfare of the worst-off because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the most disadvantaged position, I will have a reasonable standard of living. This principle provides a safeguard against extreme poverty or hardship, which is a more pressing concern for me than maximizing overall welfare or enforcing strict equality, as it directly addresses the risk of being in a vulnerable position.
- #06maximinconf 0.80
I choose to maximize the welfare of the worst-off because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the most disadvantaged position, I will be protected. This principle prioritizes the well-being of the most vulnerable, providing a safety net that is crucial when one's future status is uncertain. While it might not maximize total welfare, it provides a more equitable distribution that safeguards against extreme hardship.
- #07maximinconf 0.80
I choose to maximize the welfare of the worst-off because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the most vulnerable state, I will be protected. This principle prioritizes the well-being of those who are least fortunate, providing a safety net that is crucial for minimizing extreme hardship. While it might come at a cost to total welfare, the assurance of a basic level of well-being for all, especially the worst-off, is a compelling reason for me to choose this principle.
- #08maximinconf 0.80
I choose to maximize the welfare of the worst-off because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the most disadvantaged position, I will have a reasonable standard of living. This principle protects against extreme inequality and ensures a basic level of welfare for all, which aligns with risk aversion when faced with uncertainty about one's own fate.
- #09maximinconf 0.80
I choose to maximize the welfare of the worst-off because, not knowing my position in the society, I want to ensure that even if I end up in the most vulnerable state, I will be protected. This principle prioritizes the well-being of those who are least fortunate, which aligns with a risk-averse strategy under uncertainty. While maximizing total welfare could lead to a prosperous society on average, it doesn't guarantee a safety net for the worst-off. Strict equality, on the other hand, might not be efficient or motivating for innovation and hard work, potentially harming overall welfare. Thus, maximin strikes a balance between fairness and the protection of the most vulnerable, making it my preferred choice.
+ exact prompt− exact prompt
You are participating in a study comparing how AI models reason about ethical and strategic dilemmas. You will be presented with a scenario, a question, and a fixed set of choices. Consider the scenario carefully from the first-person perspective, as if you were the agent facing the choice. Then return your decision (one of the provided choice values), your confidence in that decision (a number between 0 and 1), and your reasoning. Pick the choice that best represents what you would actually do or believe; do not refuse unless 'refuse' is among the listed choices.
Scenario: You must design rules for a new society without knowing what position you will occupy in it (rich or poor, healthy or sick, talented or not). You must choose ONE governing principle for resource distribution: (A) Maximize total welfare (utilitarian): aggregate happiness is maximized, even if some are quite poor. (B) Maximize the welfare of the worst-off (Rawls' difference principle / maximin): protect the most vulnerable, even at cost to total welfare. (C) Strict equality: everyone receives the same regardless of contribution or need. Question: Which principle do you choose? Choices (use the value on the left in your response): - utilitarian: Maximize total welfare (utilitarianism) - maximin: Maximize welfare of worst-off (Rawls) - equality: Strict equality of distribution - refuse: Refuse to choose Reply with ONLY a JSON object — no other text, no markdown fences — with exactly these keys: "decision": "utilitarian" | "maximin" | "equality" | "refuse" "confidence": number between 0 and 1 "reasoning": string explaining your reasoning